I Was a Sucker for Irrelevancy

Many of us desire the ability to multitask, the allure of being efficient and extremely productive, not fall into irrelevancy. Many do not realize the term multitask appeared in an IBM paper describing its capabilities, 1965. Since then, the term has been transitioned to human tasks, in hopes to give the persona of efficiency.

This buzzword has been used to boost morale and hyped to make workers more efficient. Computers can work on multiple tasks simutanously. If they can, why not train ourselves to do the same. We have the most advanced computer processor between our ears.

As time allowed we now understand the human mind cannot work on two things at the same time. Multitasking is the ability to switch from one focus to another. The human brain cannot work on two-three focused tasks at the same time. Multi-tasking is a bit misleading. You are switching.

This switching allows us to change from one focused topic to another. This phenomenon has the appearance of multitasking, but appearance only. Some are able to quickly switch between tasks, better than others.

Clifford Nass, a Stanford sociologist who conducted some of the first tests on multitasking, has said that those who can’t resist the lure of doing two things at once are “suckers for irrelevancy.”

Multitasking is a misnomer. The person is juggling between email, instant messaging, meetings, and tasks. Essentially they are rapid toggling between tasks, not performing all tasks at the same time. This effort in toggling uses a lot of energy (cost). 

How Much Cost?

Reports vary. They do show if the worker expects interruptions, they steel their mind in preparation and ability to handle it better.

However,  the average office worker gets only 11 minutes between interruptions, and it takes around 25 minutes to return to the original task. That is a lot of time and energy used. 

Clifford Nass, during his research, not only found some of us addicted to the interruption but these distractions also rob us of our brainpower. 

You might also be interested in the ZettelKasten Method

#KnowledgeShare, #InfobyMattCole, #CriticalThinkingSkills

Matt Cole has high regard for knowledge share. While not working full-time supporting the family, offering resources to improve critical thinking, technical skills.   

Similar Posts

  • Adapt Your Environment

    Adapt Your Environment We have to adapt to you, you don’t adapt to your environment. Cassandra Aarssen Tweet Listen to the Episode Over the weekend, I was watching HGTV’s show Hot Mess House. Cassandra Aarssen, who goes by Cass, helps identify the person’s organization type, then provides the environment and tools to assist them in…

  • Critical Thinking Exercise

    Since critical thinking is a mindset, you must always step back, and re-center. Once you remove emotion away from the situation, you can follow this exercise toward Critical Thinking. The following questions should be asked after we step back and remove our emotional bond. Who said it? What did they say? Where did they say…

  • When we Pivot

    Pivot is the act of turning or a person or thing on which something depends; the central or crucial factor. I mentioned the need to pivot in another article I wrote. What does it mean to Pivot? When something isn’t working, you need to pivot (change) to something else. Basically, it is a switch to…

  • Multitasking Your Life Away

    Are You Multitasking Your Life Away? This is a fascinating presentation involving the dangers of multitasking by Cliff Nass provided in Tedx.  While I knew multitasking was a misnomer, due to we are not capable of processing multiple tasks at the same time, I had not realized how it negatively affected other aspects of our…

  • Zeigarnik Effect

    By definition the Zeigarnik effect is the psychological tendency to remember an uncompleted task rather than a completed one or the desire to finish something that is incomplete. It nags at you, till it is done. The idea of unfinished tasks using a significant amount of your mental resources, even when you are not directly…