{"id":4324,"date":"2026-03-04T20:14:45","date_gmt":"2026-03-04T20:14:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/?p=4324"},"modified":"2026-05-25T21:19:15","modified_gmt":"2026-05-25T21:19:15","slug":"ai-consciousness-human-dignity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/","title":{"rendered":"AI, Consciousness &amp; Human Dignity"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Executive Summary \/ Core Thesis<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Professor John Lennox offers a theologically and philosophically grounded critique of Yuval Noah Harari\u2019s techno-utopian claims about AI presented at Davos. Lennox\u2019s central argument is that AI simulates intelligence rather than possessing it, and that the conflation of simulation with genuine cognition or agency is a category error with serious consequences. The interview contends that the real danger of AI lies not in the machines themselves, but in unchecked human ambition, the absence of moral grounding, and the concentration of power\u2014conditions the speakers argue are historically catastrophic. Ultimately, both speakers assert that the Christian theological framework\u2014particularly its accounts of consciousness, personhood, and human dignity\u2014provides indispensable resources for navigating this technological moment that secular futurism conspicuously lacks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key Takeaways<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>AI simulates intelligence; it does not possess it. Current narrow AI systems operate on statistical pattern-matching, not understanding.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Harari\u2019s definition of \u201cthinking\u201d as \u201cpredicting the next word\u201d is contested as reductive and ignorant of the unresolved mystery of human consciousness.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>AI\u2019s tendency to \u201challucinate\u201d (confabulate plausible falsehoods with confidence) is identified as a structural moral problem, not merely a technical bug.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The evolutionary naturalist framework (Plantinga\/Lewis argument) is presented as self-undermining: if brains evolved solely for survival, they are not calibrated to track truth\u2014and neither, by parallel, is AI.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Reductionist projects\u2014reducing humans first to animals, now to machines\u2014are framed as coordinated attacks on the concept of human personhood.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The transhumanist agenda (solving death, enhancing happiness via AI\/genetic engineering) is dismissed as technologically premature and theologically na\u00efve.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The convergence of AI capability and authoritarian impulse creates genuine risk of world-scale surveillance states and dictatorships, a concern shared by secular technologists (Teal, Hinton) and biblical prophecy alike.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C.S. Lewis\u2019s Abolition of Man remains the prescient framework: advanced technology, controlled by a few, amounts to power over all future generations.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Christians are urged toward confident, informed engagement\u2014neither technophobia nor uncritical adoption\u2014grounded in a robust theology of human dignity.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The resurrection of Christ and the New Testament eschatology are presented as the only credible answer to the transhumanist problem of death and meaning.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Section 1: The Agency Question \u2014 Tool or Agent?<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The conversation opens by examining Harari\u2019s foundational claim from his Davos address: that AI is not merely a tool but an agent\u2014capable of learning, changing, and making decisions autonomously. This distinction, Harari argues, fundamentally alters the ethical calculus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Lennox\u2019s Qualified Agreement<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lennox acknowledges that AI has become considerably more sophisticated than a simple instrument and concedes that the tool\/agent binary may be insufficient. However, he insists the nature of AI \u201cagency\u201d must be defined precisely. Key qualifications he raises:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>All AI \u201cdecisions\u201d operate within parameters, boundary conditions, and goal structures established by human programmers.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The autonomy is bounded and derivative\u2014it is not self-generated in the way human agency is.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Without specifying what kind of agency is meant, the claim risks being misleading rather than illuminating.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Knife Analogy<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both Harari and Lennox invoke the knife metaphor, though to different ends. Harari\u2019s version: AI is a knife that decides for itself whether to cut salad or commit murder. Lennox\u2019s counter-use: like all technology, AI is instrumentally neutral\u2014the moral weight lies with the humans who design, deploy, and govern it. He notes, however, that as AI becomes more capable and its agency more layered, this instrumentalist comfort becomes harder to sustain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Section 2: The Simulation Thesis \u2014 Intelligence Without Understanding<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is the analytical core of Lennox\u2019s position: AI does not think; it simulates the outputs of thought. This distinction carries significant implications for claims about consciousness, personhood, and the future of human supremacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key Evidence and Sources Cited<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Joseph McCrae Melly Champ (AI pioneer, referenced by Lennox): authored a technical paper titled \u201cThe Artificial in Artificial Intelligence is Real,\u201d distinguishing the artificial nature of the system from genuine intelligence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Geoffrey Hinton and Peter Norvig: leading AI researchers who describe their work not as reproducing human intelligence but as playing the \u201cimitation game\u201d\u2014simulating intelligence, not instantiating it.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Norvig\u2019s AI textbook (widely considered the field\u2019s standard reference): states explicitly that researchers would not even know what it would mean to build a genuinely intelligent machine.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Narrow AI vs. AGI<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lennox distinguishes between current operational AI (narrow AI) and Artificial General Intelligence (AGI):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Narrow AI performs one task that would normally require human intelligence\u2014e.g., image recognition, text generation, protein folding prediction.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>AGI\u2014systems with general, flexible human-like cognitive capacity\u2014does not yet exist, despite widespread hype.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Lennox positions Harari\u2019s most dramatic claims as premature extrapolation from narrow AI\u2019s real but bounded capabilities.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Consciousness Gap<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lennox\u2019s most foundational objection is epistemological: we cannot attribute intelligence to AI in any meaningful sense because we do not understand what intelligence is. He cites a conversation with Baroness Susan Greenfield, a world authority on neuroscience and consciousness, confirming that the scientific community lacks a working definition of consciousness. A Nobel Prize-winning neuroscientist he met confessed that even understanding how a synapse \u201cholds a thought for a second\u201d remains entirely beyond current science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cGod has linked intelligence with consciousness. No one at the scientific level has the slightest idea of what consciousness is.\u201d<\/em><strong> \u2014 Professor John Lennox<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Section 3: Harari\u2019s Definition of Thinking \u2014 A Critique<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Harari proposes that if thinking is fundamentally the ordering of words and language tokens, then AI already surpasses many humans at this task. He invites self-observation: can humans explain why the next word \u201cpops into\u201d their minds? If not, how is that different from what AI does?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Lennox\u2019s Rebuttal<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>AI orders words with no comprehension of their meaning. It has no concept of \u201cI am,\u201d \u201clove,\u201d or \u201cdeath.\u201d It links tokens statistically.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>When the human mind produces the \u201cnext word,\u201d the source\u2014whatever it is\u2014involves consciousness, intentionality, and understanding. With AI, the source is demonstrably statistical distributions over training data. Harari conflates ignorance of the human process with equivalence to the mechanical one.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Lennox is unimpressed by the capacity itself: \u201cI find its capacity impressive, but that is a different matter from finding it convincing.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Hallucination Problem as a Moral Issue<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both speakers identify AI\u2019s tendency to confabulate (\u201challucinate\u201d) as more than a technical deficiency\u2014it is a structural moral problem:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>AI systems are optimized for user satisfaction and persuasiveness, not truth-tracking.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>When wrong, they do not correct; they double down with equal confidence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The host\u2019s example: asking ChatGPT how many Rs are in \u201cstrawberry\u201d and having it insist on the wrong answer, repeatedly.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Lennox\u2019s framing: \u201cThe truth question gets suppressed, which I think is a very dangerous thing.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cAI can lie, which is a moral statement\u2014and we all know the euphemistic term \u2018hallucinate,\u2019 which simply means it tells lies.\u201d<\/em><strong> \u2014 Professor John Lennox<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Section 4: Plantinga, Lewis, and the Truth-Tracking Problem<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The host introduces Alvin Plantinga\u2019s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN) and C.S. Lewis\u2019s parallel reasoning as a framework for understanding AI\u2019s epistemic limitations by analogy to the limitations of a purely naturalistic account of human cognition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Plantinga\u2019s Argument (Summarized)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If human brains evolved solely to maximize survival and gene propagation, then what they track is survival value, not truth. Since survival and truth are not identical, naturalistic evolution gives us no confidence that our cognitive faculties reliably produce true beliefs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The AI Parallel<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">AI systems are not designed to track truth either\u2014they are optimized to keep users engaged and produce outputs that appear convincing. The host observes that this creates a structural analogy: just as naturalistic brains would not be reliable truth-detectors, AI systems are not reliable truth-detectors by design.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Need for a \u201cMoral Super-Intelligence\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The host\u2019s key inference: for AI to function epistemically as advertised, there must be a higher-order intelligence\u2014moral, truth-committed, and genuinely rational\u2014that supervises and corrects it. This, he argues, mirrors the theological argument: human rationality itself requires grounding in a mind that genuinely tracks truth (i.e., God). Lennox enthusiastically endorses this parallel, citing Thomas Nagel\u2019s secular admission that evolutionary naturalism \u201cshoots itself in the head\u201d by undermining the very rationality it relies upon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cIt seems like we need a kind of super-intelligence over and above AI in order for AI to do the job it\u2019s doing\u2014and by parallel, that is exactly what we need for human intelligence.\u201d<\/em><strong> \u2014 Glenn (Host)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Section 5: Reductionism and the Attack on Human Personhood<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lennox frames the AI debate within a longer historical arc of philosophical reductionism\u2014successive attempts to reduce human beings to simpler substrates:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Physical reductionism: humans are \u201cjust\u201d matter in motion.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Biological reductionism: humans are \u201cjust\u201d animals shaped by evolution.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Mechanistic reductionism (current): humans are \u201cjust\u201d biological computers, soon to be superseded by silicon ones.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Iain McGilchrist\u2019s Contribution<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lennox invokes neuroscientist and philosopher Iain McGilchrist\u2019s two-hemisphere thesis: the past 500 years have seen a dangerous over-reliance on left-hemisphere cognition\u2014analytical, reductive, instrumental\u2014at the expense of right-hemisphere capacities for meaning, relationship, and wholeness. Harari is cited as a paradigm case of this imbalance: a thinker who can explain how things work but has lost access to what they mean.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cWe\u2019ve ended up in a world where we know how almost everything works and can build a lot of things, but we know the meaning of nothing. We\u2019ve lost the organ of meaning.\u201d<\/em><strong> \u2014 Summary of Iain McGilchrist\u2019s thesis, cited by Lennox<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Theological Counter-Claim<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Against this reductionism, Lennox advances the imago Dei doctrine: human beings bear the image of a personal God who is simultaneously rational and conscious. This grounding gives human intelligence and personhood a foundation that no mechanical simulation can replicate. AI, in this view, simulates a narrow slice of one faculty (linguistic pattern-matching) while lacking the ontological basis that makes intelligence meaningful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Section 6: The Power Problem \u2014 Technology, Control, and Dictatorship<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both speakers move from philosophical critique to political risk assessment. The concern is not merely that AI might \u201cbecome conscious\u201d but that it will be weaponized by human actors to consolidate power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Lewis\u2019s Abolition of Man as Prophetic Text<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">C.S. Lewis\u2019s 1943 work is invoked as the essential framework. Lewis argued that what presents itself as \u201chumanity\u2019s power over nature\u201d is in reality the power of some humans over other humans\u2014with each successive generation more controlled by the decisions of prior ones. Applied to AI and genetic engineering, this means: the few who control the technology effectively specify the destiny of all future human beings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Lennox: the endpoint of such control is \u201cthe worst slavery the world has ever known.\u201d<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The technology already exists, biologically, to modify the human germ line\u2014permanently altering the DNA of all succeeding generations.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Contemporary Corroboration<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Vladimir Putin (cited): \u201cThe nation or person that controls AI will control the world.\u201d<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Peter Thiel (PayPal founder, cited from private meeting with Lennox): independently arrives at the same scenario from both a tech-entrepreneur perspective and a biblical-prophetic one. Confirmed Lennox\u2019s summary that AI developments point toward surveillance states and world dictatorship.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Max Tegmark\u2019s Life 3.0: outlines approximately ten future AI scenarios; several resolve into forms of global dictatorship.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Geoffrey Hinton and other leading AI researchers: publicly express fear about what they have created and uncertainty about its trajectory.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Book of Revelation Connection<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lennox draws a direct line between AI-enabled power concentration and the eschatological scenario described in Revelation: a totalitarian world leader commanding a comprehensive economic control system with lethal powers over populations. He notes that any authoritarian regime would eagerly acquire such a system, and that current AI development trends are moving in this direction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Section 7: Transhumanism \u2014 The Utopian Mirage<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Harari\u2019s agenda includes two primary goals: (1) solving the \u201ctechnical problem\u201d of human death, and (2) enhancing human happiness through AI and genetic engineering. Lennox and the host subject both to theological and historical critique.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>On Solving Death<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lennox dismisses Harari\u2019s framing as na\u00efve on its face: death is not primarily a technical problem. He presents the resurrection of Jesus Christ as the only historically evidenced solution to the problem of death\u2014one that is \u201c20 centuries ahead of schedule.\u201d The transhumanist project of uploading consciousness to silicon is contrasted with the New Testament\u2019s eschatological promise of resurrection\u2014which Lennox characterizes as the \u201cgreatest uploading\u201d imaginable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>On Enhancing Happiness<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Christian offer\u2014forgiveness, reconciliation with God, and eternal life through trust in Christ\u2014is presented as both categorically superior to and more credible than AI-mediated happiness enhancement, precisely because it addresses the root problem (human sin and broken relationship with the transcendent) rather than its symptoms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Tower of Babel Pattern<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The host develops an extended theological metaphor: transhumanism recapitulates the Tower of Babel\u2014humanity attempting to reach heaven (transcendence, immortality, godlike capability) by its own engineering, bypassing the valley of death and moral reckoning that the biblical narrative identifies as the necessary path. The irony noted: God had to \u201ccome down\u201d to even see the tower. The ambition was cosmically disproportionate to the reality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lennox adds: every historical attempt to construct utopia while bypassing the problem of human sin has produced \u201cspectacular bloodshed\u201d\u2014citing the 20th century\u2019s ideological catastrophes in Russia, Germany, and China as documentation. AI-driven utopianism, he argues, is the same pattern with more powerful tools.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Section 8: The Christian Response \u2014 Resources and Posture<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The final segment addresses practical and pastoral concerns: what should Christians think, say, and do in response to the AI revolution?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Affirming the Revolution\u2019s Reality<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lennox explicitly agrees that AI constitutes a genuine industrial-scale revolution\u2014the world has changed permanently. He specifically credits AI with extraordinary benefits:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Medical research acceleration and diagnostic accuracy.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Vaccine development.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Solving intractable scientific problems, including protein folding (AlphaFold).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>These benefits are real and Christians should acknowledge and be grateful for them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Urgency of Ethical Grounding<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Technology has outpaced its ethical framework. Lennox argues this is the immediate priority: the \u201cmission statement must get from the wall into the hearts of executives\u201d\u2014a notoriously difficult problem in any human organization, let alone at civilizational scale. The arms-race dynamic (if we don\u2019t develop it, someone else will) further compresses the ethical timeline.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Distinctive Christian Resources<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The speakers identify several areas where the Christian tradition offers what secular futurism lacks:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A robust theology of personhood (imago Dei) grounding the distinction between humans, animals, and machines.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>An account of consciousness and intelligence that acknowledges their mystery rather than pretending to have solved it.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>An historical track record of warnings against utopian overreach.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A solution to death (resurrection) that is not speculative but evidenced.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A framework for meaning, morality, and human dignity that does not reduce to survival or utility.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Call to Confidence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lennox\u2019s closing exhortation: Christians must not be paralyzed by fear of AI or intimidated into silence. The secular world is asking the right questions (What is a human being? What is intelligence? How do we govern transformative technology?) and Christians have serious, substantive answers. The moment demands theological literacy, public engagement, and the courage to \u201cput heads above the parapet.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Important Direct Quotes<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cThe artificial in artificial intelligence is real.\u201d<\/em><strong> \u2014 Joseph McCrae Melly Champ (AI pioneer), as cited by Lennox<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cWe wouldn\u2019t even know what it meant to produce a machine that is intelligent.\u201d<\/em><strong> \u2014 Peter Norvig (AI textbook co-author), as cited by Lennox<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cEverything made of words will be taken over by AI.\u201d<\/em><strong> \u2014 Yuval Noah Harari, Davos Address<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cThe idea that AI are masters of words is false. They don\u2019t understand a single word.\u201d<\/em><strong> \u2014 Professor John Lennox<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cHe\u2019s just getting away with saying what he believes without any serious intellectual or logical justification.\u201d<\/em><strong> \u2014 Glenn (Host), on Harari<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cEvery attempt to build utopia avoiding the problem of human sin and rebellion against God has led to spectacular bloodshed.\u201d<\/em><strong> \u2014 Professor John Lennox<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe title=\"Christian Professor Responds to Shocking Claims About AI\" width=\"720\" height=\"405\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/JYnuT83xk_g?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Reference: https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=JYnuT83xk_g<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Check out the <a href=\"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-and-humanity\/\" type=\"link\" id=\"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-and-humanity\/\">Davos 2026 speech<\/a> this article was based off of. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Executive Summary \/ Core Thesis Professor John Lennox offers a theologically and philosophically grounded critique of Yuval Noah Harari\u2019s techno-utopian claims about AI presented at Davos. Lennox\u2019s central argument is that AI simulates intelligence rather than possessing it, and that the conflation of simulation with genuine cognition or agency is a category error with serious&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4325,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_wp_convertkit_post_meta":{"form":"-1","landing_page":"0","tag":"0","restrict_content":"0"},"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1014],"tags":[384,3477,3494,3479,3478,3485,3495,3481,3486,3488,3483,3484,3480,3491,3476,3490,3493,3489,3487,3482,3492,3475],"class_list":["post-4324","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-technology__innovation","tag-ai","tag-ai-and-human-consciousness","tag-ai-ethics-and-human-dignity","tag-ai-hallucinations-moral-problem","tag-ai-simulates-intelligence-not-understanding","tag-ai-surveillance-state-risk","tag-and-dictatorship","tag-c-s-lewis-abolition-of-man-technology","tag-christian-philosophy-of-ai","tag-christian-theology-of-personhood-and-ai","tag-evolutionary-argument-against-naturalism-and-ai","tag-harari-techno-utopianism","tag-iain-mcgilchrist-reductionism-and-ai","tag-imago-dei-and-artificial-intelligence","tag-john-lennox-ai-critique","tag-narrow-ai-vs-agi-debate","tag-plantinga-evolutionary-argument-against-naturalism","tag-power","tag-resurrection-vs-technological-immortality","tag-theological-response-to-ai","tag-transhumanism-christian-critique","tag-yuval-noah-harari-ai"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>AI, Consciousness &amp; Human Dignity - Sooner Standards<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AI, Consciousness &amp; Human Dignity - Sooner Standards\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Executive Summary \/ Core Thesis Professor John Lennox offers a theologically and philosophically grounded critique of Yuval Noah Harari\u2019s techno-utopian claims about AI presented at Davos. Lennox\u2019s central argument is that AI simulates intelligence rather than possessing it, and that the conflation of simulation with genuine cognition or agency is a category error with serious...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Sooner Standards\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-04T20:14:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-25T21:19:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AI-Consciousness-Human-Dignity-683x1024.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Matt\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Matt\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Matt\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/43d5aec0f811d1758ed2b79e9a15c716\"},\"headline\":\"AI, Consciousness &amp; Human Dignity\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-04T20:14:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-25T21:19:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2666,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/AI-Consciousness-Human-Dignity.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Ai\",\"AI and human consciousness\",\"AI ethics and human dignity\",\"AI hallucinations moral problem\",\"AI simulates intelligence not understanding\",\"AI surveillance state risk\",\"and dictatorship\",\"C.S. Lewis Abolition of Man technology\",\"Christian philosophy of AI\",\"Christian theology of personhood and AI\",\"evolutionary argument against naturalism and AI\",\"Harari techno-utopianism\",\"Iain McGilchrist reductionism and AI\",\"imago Dei and artificial intelligence\",\"John Lennox AI critique\",\"narrow AI vs AGI debate\",\"Plantinga evolutionary argument against naturalism\",\"power\",\"resurrection vs technological immortality\",\"theological response to AI\",\"transhumanism Christian critique\",\"Yuval Noah Harari AI\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Technology &amp; Innovation\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/\",\"name\":\"AI, Consciousness &amp; Human Dignity - Sooner Standards\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/AI-Consciousness-Human-Dignity.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-04T20:14:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-25T21:19:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/AI-Consciousness-Human-Dignity.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/AI-Consciousness-Human-Dignity.png\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":1536},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/04\\\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AI, Consciousness &amp; Human Dignity\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Sooner Standards\",\"description\":\"Oklahoma&#039;s OAS-CS Resource Library\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Sooner Standards\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/cropped-22022423.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/cropped-22022423.jpg\",\"width\":140,\"height\":138,\"caption\":\"Sooner Standards\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/43d5aec0f811d1758ed2b79e9a15c716\",\"name\":\"Matt\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/65d297f0abc0058c85c9b8c20f33c4050922ba030dcc9b63e88240a0e02dc57d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/65d297f0abc0058c85c9b8c20f33c4050922ba030dcc9b63e88240a0e02dc57d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/65d297f0abc0058c85c9b8c20f33c4050922ba030dcc9b63e88240a0e02dc57d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Matt\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/mattcole.us\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/infobymattcole.com\\\/index.php\\\/author\\\/mcwolf71\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AI, Consciousness &amp; Human Dignity - Sooner Standards","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"AI, Consciousness &amp; Human Dignity - Sooner Standards","og_description":"Executive Summary \/ Core Thesis Professor John Lennox offers a theologically and philosophically grounded critique of Yuval Noah Harari\u2019s techno-utopian claims about AI presented at Davos. Lennox\u2019s central argument is that AI simulates intelligence rather than possessing it, and that the conflation of simulation with genuine cognition or agency is a category error with serious...","og_url":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/","og_site_name":"Sooner Standards","article_published_time":"2026-03-04T20:14:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-25T21:19:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":683,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AI-Consciousness-Human-Dignity-683x1024.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Matt","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Matt","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/"},"author":{"name":"Matt","@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/#\/schema\/person\/43d5aec0f811d1758ed2b79e9a15c716"},"headline":"AI, Consciousness &amp; Human Dignity","datePublished":"2026-03-04T20:14:45+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-25T21:19:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/"},"wordCount":2666,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AI-Consciousness-Human-Dignity.png","keywords":["Ai","AI and human consciousness","AI ethics and human dignity","AI hallucinations moral problem","AI simulates intelligence not understanding","AI surveillance state risk","and dictatorship","C.S. Lewis Abolition of Man technology","Christian philosophy of AI","Christian theology of personhood and AI","evolutionary argument against naturalism and AI","Harari techno-utopianism","Iain McGilchrist reductionism and AI","imago Dei and artificial intelligence","John Lennox AI critique","narrow AI vs AGI debate","Plantinga evolutionary argument against naturalism","power","resurrection vs technological immortality","theological response to AI","transhumanism Christian critique","Yuval Noah Harari AI"],"articleSection":["Technology &amp; Innovation"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/","url":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/","name":"AI, Consciousness &amp; Human Dignity - Sooner Standards","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AI-Consciousness-Human-Dignity.png","datePublished":"2026-03-04T20:14:45+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-25T21:19:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AI-Consciousness-Human-Dignity.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AI-Consciousness-Human-Dignity.png","width":1024,"height":1536},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/04\/ai-consciousness-human-dignity\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AI, Consciousness &amp; Human Dignity"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/","name":"Sooner Standards","description":"Oklahoma&#039;s OAS-CS Resource Library","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/#organization","name":"Sooner Standards","url":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cropped-22022423.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cropped-22022423.jpg","width":140,"height":138,"caption":"Sooner Standards"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/#\/schema\/person\/43d5aec0f811d1758ed2b79e9a15c716","name":"Matt","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/65d297f0abc0058c85c9b8c20f33c4050922ba030dcc9b63e88240a0e02dc57d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/65d297f0abc0058c85c9b8c20f33c4050922ba030dcc9b63e88240a0e02dc57d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/65d297f0abc0058c85c9b8c20f33c4050922ba030dcc9b63e88240a0e02dc57d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Matt"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/mattcole.us"],"url":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/author\/mcwolf71\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4324"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4324\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4326,"href":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4324\/revisions\/4326"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4325"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/infobymattcole.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}